LEADERSHIP, CORPORATE GOVERNANCE, AND ACCOUNTABILITY

Authors

Sixbert SANGWA
African Leadership University image/svg+xml
Placide MUTABAZI
Open Christian University image/svg+xml

Synopsis

Leadership and corporate governance address two related but distinct problems: how collective purpose becomes credible action and how entrusted power remains answerable to legitimate claimants. This chapter develops an integrated, theoretically critical account of influence, fiduciary oversight, institutional accountability, and responsible enterprise direction. It compares trait, behavioral, contingency, transformational, transactional, servant, ethical, and distributed leadership perspectives with agency, stewardship, stakeholder, and institutional approaches to governance. The method is a critical, targeted synthesis of foundational scholarship, peer-reviewed meta-analytic evidence, professional standards, official Rwandan documents, and regulatory enforcement records, with an evidentiary cut-off of 24 October 2026. The 2 October 2026 capital-market governance regulations provide a newly enacted jurisdictional anchor, interpreted with explicit scope qualifications. Twelve sections trace leadership judgment, boards and committees, incentive conflicts, independence, alternative organizational forms, ethical reporting, digital and sustainability governance, failures and recovery, African institutional realities, and performance measurement. The documented Wells Fargo enforcement sequence is analyzed alongside a constructed Rwandan cooperative redesign; the latter is explicitly pedagogical rather than empirical. Original analytical outputs include a board-accountability map, comparative theory matrix, risk-oversight assignment instrument, governance scorecard, and reproducible expected-loss decision. The chapter argues that credible governance is neither an impressive board composition nor charismatic leadership in isolation. It is a testable configuration of authorized decision rights, informed challenge, verifiable controls, fair treatment, organizational learning, and remedy. The proposed synthesis is conceptual; it does not claim new causal identification or external validation.

Downloads

Forthcoming

24 October 2026